Tanner v. Rebel Aviation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether Federal Aviation Administration regulations were passed for appellant’s benefit
• court held section 91.403(a), formerly 14 C.ER §91.163, did not provide current owner of aircraft with cause of action against past owner of aircraft for failure to maintain aircraft in airworthy condition pursuant to section 91.403(a) duty
• court held section 91.403(a), formerly 4 “When considering [section 91.403(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).