Tanner v. Hartog

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing an exception for negligent medical care resulting in a child being stillborn
• holding the impact rule was inapplicable to a claim of negligent stillbirth
• noting the desirability of the impact rule for proving the genuineness of emotional distress claims and holding the impact rule inapplicable only to \narrow classes of cases\ like negligent stillbirth and wrongful birth
• describing invasion of privacy and wrongful birth as recognized torts that fall within this narrow exception to the impact rule
• \It is difficult to justify the outright denial of a claim for the mental pain and anguish which is so likely to be experienced.\
• \It is difficult to justify the outright denial of a claim for the mental pain and anguish which is so likely to be experienced.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).