Skip to main content
· 7/2/1987

Tanner Companies v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 743 P.2d 951
  • 154 Ariz. 442
  • 1987 Ariz. App. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a party may not recover as a third party beneficiary “if it is merely an incidental beneficiary . . . rather than one for whose express benefit the [contract] was executed”
  • stating a party may not recover as a third party beneficiary “if it is merely an incidental beneficiary . . . rather than one for whose express benefit the [contract] was executed”
  • stating a party may not recover as a third party beneficiary “if it is merely an 20 incidental beneficiary . . . rather than one for whose express benefit the [contract] was 21 made”
  • “Arguments not made in the trial court cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Eubank, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.