· 7/2/1987
Tanner Companies v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc.
Citations
- 743 P.2d 951
- 154 Ariz. 442
- 1987 Ariz. App. LEXIS 435
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a party may not recover as a third party beneficiary “if it is merely an incidental beneficiary . . . rather than one for whose express benefit the [contract] was executed”
- stating a party may not recover as a third party beneficiary “if it is merely an incidental beneficiary . . . rather than one for whose express benefit the [contract] was executed”
- stating a party may not recover as a third party beneficiary “if it is merely an 20 incidental beneficiary . . . rather than one for whose express benefit the [contract] was 21 made”
- “Arguments not made in the trial court cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corcoran, Eubank, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.