Tanks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecution for aggravated stalking which was predicated on the same act as a prior contempt proceeding was subject to double jeopardy clause
• prosecution for aggravated stalking which was predicated on the same act as a prior contempt proceeding was subject to double jeopardy clause
• protection of Double Jeopardy Clause attaches in nonsummary criminal contempt proceeding
• where legal error is asserted, review is de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• WARD v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-07-02· cited 4×
• State v. McDowell
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-12-17· cited 1×
• In Re Arnold Ragas
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-06-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• United States v. Dixon
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
• Perkinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-02-05· cited 37×
• Garland v. State of Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1960-04-01· cited 33×
• Cutter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-10-17· cited 32×
• Garland v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-01-09· cited 31×
• Daker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-03-05· cited 19×
• State v. Aycock
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-02-19· cited 3×