Tankersley v. Barker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a double recovery on tort and breach of contract claims was prohibited
• involving a cause of action for fraud and noting “[t]he existence of a confidential relationship is a question for the jury.”
• “One can pursue any number of inconsistent remedies prior to formulation and entry of judgment.”
• existence of a confidential relationship is for a jury and there was no error in denying the motion for a directed verdict on that issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).