Tanker Hygrade No. 12, Inc. v. American Pipe & Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that postconviction counsel must shape petitioner’s complaints in a pro se petition into “appropriate legal form”
• holding that a presumption exists that “counsel [has] made a concerted effort to obtain affidavits in support of the [otherwise nonviable] post-conviction claims”
• holding that postconviction counsel must shape petitioner's complaints in a pro se petition into \appropriate legal form\
• holding that a presumption exists that \counsel [has] made a concerted effort to obtain affidavits in support of the [otherwise nonviable] post-conviction claims\
• holding that postconviction counsel must shape petitioner’s complaints in a pro se petition into “appropriate legal form”
• holding that it is the duty of the trial court, not the reviewing court, to determine based on a complete record whether the postconviction claim requires an evidentiary hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).