Skip to main content
· 4/9/2015

Tanita F. Kehoe, Scott Kehoe, and Thomas David White, Jr. v. Edward A. Clouse and Helen R. Clouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying McKesson’s analysis in determining that the taxicab licensees could be entitled to recover a portion of their fees and assessments paid under an unconstitutional state statute that violated their due process rights
  • applying McKesson Corp. in a case where licensed taxicab companies sought (Footnote continued on next page…) 10 whether SBI is entitled to due process but, as it is often put, “what process is due.” Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481 (1972
  • “Licensees could be entitled to recover only the portion, if any, of their fees and assessments that exceeded the amount the Authority would have assessed had it been subject to constitutional standards, guidance, and limits imposed by the General Assembly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.