· 2/29/2016
Tanikumi v. Walt Disney Co.
Citations
- 136 S. Ct. 1245
- 194 L. Ed. 2d 172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the court is not “required to accept non-specific factual allegations and inferences or unwarranted legal conclusions”
- stating that the court is not “required to accept non-specific factual allegations and inferences or unwarranted legal conclusions”
- stating that the court is not “required to accept non-specific factual allegations and inferences or unwarranted legal conclusions”
- stating that the court is not “required to accept non-specific factual allegations and inferences or unwarranted legal conclusions”
- stating that the court is not “required to accept non-specific factual allegations and inferences or unwarranted legal conclusions”
- stating that the court is not “required to accept non-specific factual allegations and inferences or unwarranted legal conclusions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.