Skip to main content
· 3/3/1982

Tanenbaum v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.

Citations

  • 628 S.W.2d 769
  • 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 124
  • 25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 210
  • 1982 Tex. LEXIS 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice to the debtor of a foreclosure sale is an essential element in any deficiency claim within article 9
  • holding that a note holder is not entitled to a deficiency judgment unless collateral seized has been disposed of in a commercially reasonable manner
  • holding that a note holder is not entitled to a deficiency judgment unless collateral seized has been disposed of in a commercially reasonable manner
  • holding that a note holder is not entitled to a deficiency judgment unless collateral seized has been disposed of in a commercially reasonable manner
  • holding that a note holder is not entitled to a deficiency judgment unless collateral seized has been disposed of in a commercially reasonable manner
  • stating that the combination of sections 9.504 and 9.505 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code “put the creditor to an election to either sell ... or to retain the collateral”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.