· 10/7/1964
Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. Welfare Finance Corp.
Citations
- 177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 54
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding the North Dakota statute prohibiting solicitation of “do not call” registrants under an intermediate scrutiny review
- “[R]esidential privacy is a significant government interest, particularly when telemarketing calls are flourishing, and becoming a recurring nuisance by virtue of their quantity”
- “[R]esidential privacy is a significant government interest, particularly when telemarketing calls are flourishing, and becoming a recurring nuisance by virtue of their quantity”
- “[R]esidential privacy is a significant government interest, particularly when telemarketing calls are flourishing, and becoming a recurring nuisance by virtue of their quantity” (internal quotations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.