Skip to main content
· 10/7/1964

Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. Welfare Finance Corp.

Citations

  • 177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding the North Dakota statute prohibiting solicitation of “do not call” registrants under an intermediate scrutiny review
  • “[R]esidential privacy is a significant government interest, particularly when telemarketing calls are flourishing, and becoming a recurring nuisance by virtue of their quantity”
  • “[R]esidential privacy is a significant government interest, particularly when telemarketing calls are flourishing, and becoming a recurring nuisance by virtue of their quantity”
  • “[R]esidential privacy is a significant government interest, particularly when telemarketing calls are flourishing, and becoming a recurring nuisance by virtue of their quantity” (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Griffith, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.