Tandy v. DCSE/VIOLET TANDY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, as “a matter of hornbook law,” the scope of a choice of law provision is determined under the law that the provision selects
• finding new comprehensive plan not applicable where plan took effect after City adopted zoning decision in dispute
• a contract “should not be interpreted in a crabbed way that creates a commercially senseless bifurcation between pure contract claims and other claims that arise solely because of the nature of the relations between the parties created by the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).