Tandy & Farleigh Tobacco Co. v. Briggance & Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and concluding that “Werwinski’s predication of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling on the economic loss doctrine remains binding on the district courts in this circuit until either the Pennsylvania Supreme Court or the Third Circuit rules otherwise”
• “This Court concludes that, when the Third Circuit has predicted how the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will rule on an issue, it is bound by that precedent unless one of those two courts subsequently rules otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).