Skip to main content
· 7/14/2004

Tand v. SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF NASSAU CTY.

Citations

  • 324 F. Supp. 2d 379
  • 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3177
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13129
  • 2004 WL 1575231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because “the plaintiff[’]s claims are covered by the CBA ..., the [plaintiff] was compelled to use the contractual grievance and arbitration remedies provided for in the agreement”
  • “Suits arising under section 301 include those seeking to vindicate uniquely personal rights of employees such as wages, hours, overtime pay, and wrongful discharge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.