Tanana Valley Ry. Co. v. Washington-Alaska Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting aside the solicitation and acknowledging that the “plain language of RFPs 583 and 247 appears to contradict the CO’s choice” in NAICS code, but not making an affirmative declaration as to which NAICS code the agency should use
• challenge to agency’s assignment of NAICS code to the SBA “is an administrative remedy which must be exhausted before judicial review of a code designation is permitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).