Skip to main content
· 7/2/1996

Tana v. Professionals Prototype I Insurance

Citations

  • 47 Cal. App. 4th 1612
  • 55 Cal. Rptr. 2d 160
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5687
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 9249
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no duty to defend where malpractice insurance excluded legal fees from covered damages and the action clearly did not complain of anything lawyer did or did not do, but clearly sought only the return of attorney fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lambden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.