Tampa Transit Lines v. Nickolai

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ”an indigent defendant, charged with a summary offense punishable by imprisonment, is not entitled to counsel where the court pre- determines that a sentence of imprisonment is unlikely, and no term of imprisonment is imposed after conviction”
• stating that “[i]t is not for [the appellate court] to overturn the credibility determinations of the fact-finder”
• stating that “[i]t is not for this Court to overturn the credibility determinations of the fact-finder.”
• stating that “[i]t is not for this Court to overturn the credibility determinations of that fact-finder.”
• stating that “[i]t is not for this Court to overturn the credibility determinations of the fact-finder.”
• stating that “[i]t is not for this Court to overturn the credibility determinations of the fact-finder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).