Skip to main content
· 6/29/1921

Tampa Electric Co. v. Sanders

Citations

  • 82 Fla. 64
  • 89 So. 366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that direct appeal from subsequent conviction is the proper context in which to seek review of trial court’s ruling declaring mistrial over defendant’s objection at previous trial
  • stating that where the original sentencing jury had deadlocked the trial court, instead of impaneling a new sentencing jury, should have proceeded in accord with KRS 532.055 and imposed a sentence
  • sufficiently material if it has the potential to influence a tribunal or jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.