Tampa Electric Co. v. Barber

Citations

• 81 Fla. 405
• 88 So. 302

Syllabus

<p>In an action under the statute against a railroad or street car company to recover compensation “for any damage done” to persons or property by the running of the company’s cars, where the verdict is for the plaintiff and the preponderance of the testimony tends to “make it appear that the agents of the defendant company exercised all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence,” in the premises, a new trial should be granted.</p>