Tamosaitis v. URS Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that New York law requires that claims of disparagement “must contain 'specific assertions of unfavorable facts reflecting upon the rival product” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• no disparagement where patent infringement alleged because the underlying complaint contained no “specific assertions of unfavorable facts reflecting upon the rival product”
• “The product itself is not an advertisement within the meaning of the policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).