Tammy S. Scusa v. Nestle U.S. A. Company, Inc., Doing Business as Friskies Petcare Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appropriate action was taken when no incidents of harassment were repeated after the offending employee was sanctioned
• finding that in context of sexual hostile-work-environment claim, employee must establish harassment was so severe or pervasive as to alter term, condition, or privilege of employment
• noting that the plaintiff admitted that she had yelled at other employees, used foul language, and teased other employees
• noting that the plaintiff admitted that she had yelled at other employees, used foul language, and teased other employees
• stating that actionable harassment must be “so intimidating, offensive, or hostile that it poisoned the work environment”
• observing that unpleasant conduct and rude comments were not so severe or pervasive as to have altered conditions of plaintiff’s employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).