Tammy R. Ward v. Joshua K. Waters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a rejection for anticipation is appropriate only if one reference \expressly incorporates a particular part\ of another reference
• reasoning that a rejection for anticipation is appropriate only if one reference “expressly incorporates a particular part” of another reference
• reasoning that a rejection for anticipation is appropriate only if one reference “expressly incorporates a particular part” of another reference.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).