Skip to main content
· 1/29/2014

Tammy Bell v. Jon Thornburg

Citations

  • 743 F.3d 84
  • 2014 WL 321879
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1895
  • 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,986
  • 121 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party “must 16 See supra, n.13. only allege ‘a causal connection between what [it] has done under asserted official authority and the state action’” to assert a colorable federal defense (quoting Mesa v. California, 489 U.S. 121, 129 (1989))
  • noting “the U.S. Trustee is an officer of the Department of Justice, not of the court.”
  • deeming an asserted federal defense colorable simply because it satisfied the “causal connection” requirement of the federal officer removal test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Per Curiam, Prado, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.