Tammi Swinney v. Maxine Acola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]o be ‘actual,’ the benefit must come from the existence and enforceability of the restriction”
• not considering whether the touch-and-concern doctrine still applied after it was abandoned in the Restatement
• declining to reconsider touch-and-concern doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).