TAMI J. ALBRECHT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that default judgment alone could not support the entry of a permanent injunction
• noting that, though the case relates to real estate, “we hesitate to suggest that every contract involving real estate should be enforceable as a matter of course by injunctions”
• noting that \[b]ecause of the absence of a fully liquid market in real property and the frequent presence of subjective values... the calculation of damages is difficult\
• noting that “[b]ecause of the absence of a fully liquid market in real property and the frequent presence of subjective values ... the calculation of damages is difficult”
• weighing benefits and costs of ordering damages against those of imposing injunction
• “‘Irreparable’ in the injunction context means not rectifiable by the entry of a final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).