Tamburello v. Welch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that peremptory challenges are used to ensure \that the controversy is decided by a jury whose members are not predisposed by reason of temperament or prior experience to look with disfavor upon his side of the case\
• A Even before the adoption of the Rules of Civil Procedure, a refusal to allow the proper number of peremptory challenges was [often] regarded as immaterial . . . . @
• “In a civil case, ‘a refusal to allow the proper number of peremptory challenges [is] regarded as immaterial in the absence of a showing that the party affected was required to accept one or more jurors whom he wished to challenge’ ”
• no cross-action, but antagonism existed
• no cross-action, but antagonism existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).