Tamara Diaz v. Kubler Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether debt collector violated provisions of federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act
• ‘When interpreting state law, we are bound to follow the decisions of the state’s highest court ...” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “When interpreting state law, we are bound to follow the decisions of the state’s highest court ...” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[P]rejudgment interest under section 3287(a) becomes available as of the 24 day the amount at issue becomes calculable . . . mechanically, on the basis of uncontested 25 and conceded evidence, and it is available as a matter of right.” (citation omitted)
• surveying California law in 8 breach of contract appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).