Skip to main content
· 9/29/2021

TAMARA CARUS v. VRMTG ASSET TRUST

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming that periodic flooding does not constitute flooding in a continuous manner necessary to acquire the right to flood in the future
  • reaffirming that periodic flooding does not constitute flooding in a continuous manner necessary to acquire the right to flood in the future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.