Skip to main content

Tamara B. v. Pete F.

Citations

  • 80 N.Y.2d 959
  • 591 N.Y.S.2d 134
  • 605 N.E.2d 870
  • 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 3790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Labor Law § 241(6) is inapplicable where there is no showing that “a violation of a safety regulation promulgated pursuant to Labor Law § 241(6) was the proximate cause of the accident.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Tamara B. v. Pete F.

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.