Tamar v. Mind C.T.I., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]his argument was raised for the first time at oral argument and so was waived in terms of this motion.”
• “Leave to amend is appropriately denied where the plaintiff has already had an opportunity to replead after specific warnings as to a complaint’s deficiencies.”
• “Leave to amend is appropriately denied where the plaintiff has already had an opportunity to replead after specific warnings as to a complaint’s deficiencies.”
• “Leave to amend is appropriately denied where the plaintiff has already had an opportunity to replead after specific warnings as to a complaint’s deficiencies.”
• “Leave to amend is appropriately denied where . . . the plaintiff has already had an opportunity to replead after specific warnings as to a complaint’s deficiencies.”
• An “argument [that] is not made in any of Plaintiff’s papers” is deemed waived.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).