Tamalunis v. City of Georgetown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that allegations referring to the defendants collectively were insufficient to meet Rule 9(b)
• stating a conversion action could be maintained for the recovery of money physically taken from a person’s possession, but a conversion claim could not be brought where the property right alleged to have been converted arose entirely from contractual rights
• “Bad faith is generally described as ‘an intentional tort which results from a breach of the implied contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing.’”
• “The fact that the plaintiffs have alleged general breach of contract claims for the [contract] . . . does not preclude the plaintiffs from alleging separate claims arising from the alleged breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).