Skip to main content
· 4/23/1997

Talman v. United States

Citations

  • 37 Fed. Cl. 741
  • 79 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2303
  • 1997 U.S. Claims LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since the money was forfeited under federal law, it is immaterial what R.C. 2933.43 states about its return. [The property owner’s] claim, if any, is against the federal government.”
  • when property and money are forfeited under federal law, Ohio forfeiture provisions are immaterial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andewelt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.