Skip to main content
· 5/29/1884

Talmadge v. Stretch

Citations

  • 2 Cal. Unrep. 323
  • 4 P. 15

Syllabus

<p>Promissory Note—Parol Evidence.—Where a Eeceipt and a Note are executed contemporaneously, the receipt is admissible in an action on the note, where there is evidence to show that both were part of one transaction; and oral testimony is admissible to apply the receipt to the note and to prove that it was the only consideration for the note.</p> <p>Promissory Note—Consideration.—Money Advanced by the Plaintiff to the defendant on account of the latter’s share of the capital in a business, which sum he was to invest and contribute to the business, is sufficient consideration to support a note given to secure such sum, and plaintiff may recover on such note, though the plaintiff and defendant were partners at the time of giving such note.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.