Skip to main content
· 1/22/1997

Tallman v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.

Citations

  • 558 N.W.2d 208
  • 1997 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 2
  • 1997 WL 24842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding manufacturer of asbestos spray insulation was protected by fifteen-year statute of repose in Iowa Code § 614.1(11) (1993) against claim brought by worker exposed to asbestos
  • holding manufacturer of asbestos spray insulation was protected by fifteen-year statute of repose in Iowa Code § 614.1(11) (1993) against claim brought by worker exposed to asbestos
  • refusing to detract from the “bright line” attachment rule by considering intention to enhance the value of the property once the product was attached
  • the “bright line test” is physical attachment, which cannot be disregarded in favor of enhancement of value and intent to make the property more useful or valuable
  • intent is an unreliable touchstone for determining whether the material is an improvement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Carter, Lavorato, Snell, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.