New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1/5/1993
Talley v. Talley
Citations
- 847 P.2d 323
- 115 N.M. 89
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that it is not an 5 abuse of discretion when reasons both supporting and detracting from a decision 6 exist
- affirming the amount of child support awarded because the father’s income from real estate contracts and potential income from idle assets justified the amount awarded
- upholding an award of indefinite spousal support, notwithstanding the fact that 8 the payor’s remaining income would not cover his normal monthly expenses
- where there exist reasons both supporting and detracting from a district court decision, there is no abuse of discretion
- “When 18 there exist reasons both supporting and detracting from a trial court decision, there is 19 no abuse of discretion.”
- “When there exist 18 reasons both supporting and detracting from a [district] court decision, there is no 19 abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Minzner, Black, Flores
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.