Talley-Siders v. Mayhorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police officers acquiesced in petitioner’s torture when they “looked on and did [] nothing but laugh”
• concluding that “[n]either the IJ nor the BIA cited any affirmative [e]vidence that [the petitioner] could relocate” even where the BIA relied on “the lack of any attempt to relocate” by the petitioner
• holding that an applicant seeking relief under the CAT must establish that he “will more likely than not be tortured with the consent or acquiescence of a public official if removed to h[is] native country”
• holding that an applicant seeking relief under the CAT must establish that she “will more likely than not be tortured with the consent or acquiescence of a public official if removed to her native country”
• holding that an applicant seeking relief under the CAT must establish that he “will more likely than not be tortured with the consent or acquiescence of a public official if removed to h[is] native country”
• holding that an applicant seeking relief under the CAT must establish that he “will more likely than not be tortured with the consent 3 or acquiescence of a public official if removed to h[is] native country”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).