Tallent v. Cates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[t]he failure of any court to expressly provide such interest in its judgment does not abrogate the statute”
• explaining that “[i]nterest on judgments in Tennessee is statutorily mandated”
• explaining that “[i]nterest on judgments in Tennessee is statutorily mandated”
• finding installment plan was unreasonable when the “court[-]ordered payments . . . of $200 monthly, with postjudgment interest accruing at 10% annually, would not cover even the interest, let alone pay down the judgment”
• “The failure of any court to expressly provide such interest in its judgment does not abrogate the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).