Tallant v. Kaufman (In Re Tallant)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that §§ 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(4) are not mutually exclusive
• noting the 7 Ninth Circuit has adopted neither a broad nor expansive view as 8 to what constitutes a statement respecting financial condition 9 and finding a profit and loss statement was a statement 10 regarding financial condition
• relying on Fowler Bros. v. Young (In re Young), 91 F.3d 1367, 1373 (10th Cir.1996), determining that the subsections of § 523 are generally not mutually exclusive and recognizing that, although a relationship might not satisfy the elements of § 523(a)(4
• inferring an 23 implicit finding from a similar bankruptcy court ruling
• inferring an 23 implicit finding from a similar bankruptcy court ruling
• attorney was not fiduciary but could be held liable for fraud or misrepresentation against client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).