Talisman Energy USA, Inc. v. Matrix Petroleum, LLC, Matrix Petroleum Holdings, LLC, and JAR Resources Holdings, L.P. (Cross-Appellants)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 23.1 dismissal had preclusive effect under standard that required a final judgment on the merits
• holding that Rule 23.1 dismissal had preclusive effect under standard that required a final judgment on the merits
• predicting that Arkansas Supreme Court would give preclusive effect to non-merits-based dismissal of derivative action on standing grounds for failure to plead demand futility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).