Skip to main content
· 7/25/2008

TalentBurst, Inc. v. Collabera, Inc.

Citations

  • 567 F. Supp. 2d 261
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56210
  • 2008 WL 2854496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the court’s order “could not have been more clear and unambiguous” when it provided that “Defendants shall not carry out the proposed ‘downstream’ merger of Biolitec AG with its Austrian subsidiary.”
  • allowing Plaintiff’s emergency motion for sanctions, issuing an arrest warrant for Defendant Neuberger for civil contempt, and levying coercive fines
  • allowing Plaintiff's emergency motion for sanctions, issuing an arrest warrant for Defendant Neuberger for civil contempt, and levying coercive fines
  • “Defendants have the keys to their prison in their own pockets. The coercive fines and arrest warrant ... will be lifted as soon as the court is satisfied that the status quo ante has been restored.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.