Talbert v. G.A.T. Airline Ground Support, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that doctrine does not violate right of confrontation
• modifying prior precedent concerning constancy of accusation rule without applying new rule to case on appeal
• modifying prior precedent concerning constancy of accusation rule without applying new rule to case on appeal
• trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied suppression of untimely disclosed evidence but granted continuance
• limitation on constancy of accusation testimony to fact and timing of sexual assault victim’s statement does not affect whether details of statement may be substantively admitted under hearsay exceptions
• modification of common-law constancy of accusation doctrine to address modem day and competing considerations by narrowing doctrine to allow introduction of testimony regarding fact and timing, but not details, of victim’s sexual assault complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).