Talasila, Inc., and M.R. Mikkilineni v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that previous 15 version of Rule 83.1(a)(3), which provided that “[a] corporation may only be represented by counsel” was “clear and unqualified”
• recognizing that previous version of Rule 83.1(a)(3), which provided that “[a] corporation may only be represented by counsel” was “clear and unqualified”
• affirming the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of a complaint filed by a corporation because the corporation could not appear pro se
• applying Texas corporation law and holding that where the corporation was dissolved following initiation of the suit, the sole successor-in-interest was not the real party in interest in the case and could not appear pro se
• “[A corporation] must be represented by counsel in order to pursue its claims against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims.”
• “[An entity] must be represented by counsel in order to pursue its claim against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).