Skip to main content
· 3/23/2001

Taita Chemical Co. v. Westlake Styrene Corp.

Citations

  • 246 F.3d 377
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4516
  • 2001 WL 285998

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Moreover, it is well established that even if the written contract contains a provision requiring that all modifications be in writing . . . either oral agreement or conduct can nonetheless prove modification.”
  • “Moreover, it is well established that even if the written contract contains a provision requiring that all modifications be in writing . . . either oral agreement or conduct can nonetheless prove modification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Demoss, Kent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.