Skip to main content
· 3/26/2020

Taimoor Gilani v. River Park Crossing, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • summary judgment for attorney appropriate where former client failed to demonstrate that attorney's delay resulted in lesser settlement amount
  • expert's speculative and conclusory opinion lacked substantive support in record and therefore did not create issue of material fact
  • expert witness’ conclusory opinion that the claim would have settled not sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact on the element of proximate “but for” causation
  • the plaintiff's expert testimony that, but for the delay in prosecuting the case, the claim would have settled for a larger sum was speculative and conclusory and therefore insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact in a legal malpractice case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.