Tahir Useinovic v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no showing of persecution where robbery “was primarily aimed at [the alien] personally” and not at a theft of valuables
• noting that petitioner “did not suffer severe consequences for his actions at the time he acted, and the passage of time since these activities only less- ened the likelihood he would face any persecution”
• “the existence of past incidents of persecution creates a rebuttable presumption of future persecution”
• fact that applicant did not suffer severe consequences for his activities combined with the passage of time since those activities decreased the likelihood of future persecution
• “the existence of past incidents of persecution creates a rebuttable presumption of future persecution”
• discussing relationship between NACARA and INA § 244

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).