Skip to main content

Tagupa v. VIPDESK.

Citations

  • 135 Haw. 468
  • 353 P.3d 1010
  • 25 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 633
  • 2015 Haw. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that prior to a statutory award of attorneys' fees for a frivolous claim, the court must make a specific finding that all or a portion of the claims made by a party are frivolous
  • “A frivolous claim is a ‘claim so manifestly and palpably without merit, so as to indicate bad faith on the [pleader’s] part such that argument to the court was not required.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Coll v. McCarthy, 72 Haw. 20, 29—30, 804 P.2d 881, 887 (1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Tagupa v. VIPDESK.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.