· 8/10/2010

Tagouma v. Investigative Consultant Services, Inc.

Citations

4 A.3d 170
2010 Pa. Super. 147
2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2099
2010 WL 3123173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

public surveillance of individual while praying was not intrusion upon seclusion; neither his thoughts, prayers, nor expressions were viewed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Lazarus, Olson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.