Tagama v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that district court has discretion to appoint counsel in proceedings under § 3582(c) if interests of justice so require
• noting that district court has discretion to appoint counsel in proceedings under § 3582(c) if interests of justice so require
• noting that district court has discretion to appoint counsel in proceedings under § 3582(c) if interests of justice so require
• explaining that district courts “need not engage in ritualistic incantation in order to establish [] consideration of a legal issue”
• holding criminal defendant has no right to counsel in 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) proceedings
• recognizing criminal defendant has no right to counsel in 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).