Skip to main content

Tafero v. State

Citations

  • 406 So. 2d 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • illustrating the distinctions between the standards which apply to a motion for new trial and to a coram nobis proceeding
  • third-party confession to crime and recantation of testimony by important state witnesses to fourth party held insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz and Daniel S. Pearson, JJ. and Pearson, Tillman (Ret.), Associate Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.