Tadsen v. Praegitzer Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the premise in a wrongful discharge case that “an employer should enjoy a conclusive presumption that, had it not discharged the employee illegally, it would have discharged him or her lawfully at any time after it in fact did so unlawfully”
• rejecting the premise in a wrongful discharge case that “an employer should enjoy a conclusive presumption that, had it not discharged the employee illegally, it would have discharged him or her lawfully at any time after it in fact did so unlawfully”
• under earlier, but identical, version of ORS 659A.885(3), plaintiffs compensatory award included both economic and noneconomic damages
• under earlier, but identical, version of ORS 659A.885(3), plaintiff's compensatory award included both economic and noneconomic damages
• weaknesses in a plaintiffs evidence concerning damages may be explored by contrary evidence
• “[F]ront pay is a form of compensatory damages, because it restores the terminated employee to the economic position that the employee would have enjoyed, were it not for the employer’s unlawful conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).