Skip to main content
· 9/14/1995

Tacoma Athletic Club, Inc. v. Indoor Comfort Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 902 P.2d 175
  • 79 Wash. App. 250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing applicability of Washington’s UCC in “mixed” contracts for the sale of goods and services
  • construction contracts involving services and transactions in goods are only subject to the UCC if the predominant aspect of the contracts is the sale of goods
  • construction contracts involving services and transactions in goods are subject to the UCC only if the predominant aspect of the contracts is the sale of goods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.